Theory and associated phenomenology for intrinsic mortality arising from natural selection
Justin Werfel, Donald E. Ingber, Yaneer Bar-Yam

TL;DR
This paper presents a spatial evolutionary model demonstrating that natural selection can favor intrinsic mortality and programmed death, challenging traditional assumptions and explaining various empirical observations.
Contribution
It introduces a spatial model showing that self-limited lifespan can be evolutionarily advantageous, providing a new theoretical basis for intrinsic mortality.
Findings
Self-limited lifespan benefits lineages over the long term
Shorter lifespan can be favored due to environmental feedback
Empirical data on lifespan and mortality align with model predictions
Abstract
Standard evolutionary theories of aging and mortality, implicitly based on assumptions of spatial averaging, hold that natural selection cannot favor shorter lifespan without direct compensating benefit to individual reproductive success. Here we show that both theory and phenomenology are consistent with programmed death. Spatial evolutionary models show that self-limited lifespan robustly results in long-term benefit to a lineage; longer-lived variants may have a reproductive advantage for many generations, but shorter lifespan ultimately confers long-term reproductive advantage through environmental feedback acting on much longer time scales. Numerous model variations produce the same qualitative result, demonstrating insensitivity to detailed assumptions; the key conditions under which self-limited lifespan is favored are spatial extent and locally exhaustible resources. Numerous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
