Reexamination of the evidence for entanglement in the D-Wave processor

TL;DR

This paper critically examines evidence for entanglement in a D-Wave quantum annealer, comparing classical, semiclassical, and quantum models, and finds that only a quantum master equation reproduces experimental results, supporting the entanglement claim.

Contribution

It demonstrates that the quantum adiabatic master equation uniquely matches experimental data, strengthening evidence for entanglement in the D-Wave device.

Findings

Only the quantum master equation reproduces experimental spectroscopy data.

Classical rotor and simulated quantum annealing models fail to match the experiment.

Results support the presence of entanglement in the D-Wave processor.

Abstract

A recent experiment [Lanting et al., PRX, (2014)] claimed to provide evidence of up to $8$-qubit entanglement in a D-Wave quantum annealing device. However, entanglement was measured using qubit tunneling spectroscopy, a technique that provides indirect access to the state of the system at intermediate times during the anneal by performing measurements at the end of the anneal with a probe qubit. In addition, an underlying assumption was that the quantum transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian, whose ground states are already highly entangled, is an appropriate model of the device, and not some other (possibly classical) model. This begs the question of whether alternative, classical or semiclassical models would be equally effective at predicting the observed spectrum and thermal state populations. To check this, we consider a recently proposed classical rotor model with classical Monte Carlo updates, which has been successfully employed in describing features of earlier experiments involving the device. We also consider simulated quantum annealing with quantum Monte Carlo updates, an algorithm that samples from the instantaneous Gibbs state of the device Hamiltonian. Finally, we use the quantum adiabatic master equation, which cannot be efficiently simulated classically, and which has previously been used to successfully capture the open system quantum dynamics of the device. We find that only the master equation is able to reproduce the features of the tunneling spectroscopy experiment, while both the classical rotor model and simulated quantum annealing fail to reproduce the experimental results. We argue that this bolsters the evidence for the reported entanglement.