Dependence of the saturation level of magnetorotational instability on gas pressure and magnetic Prandtl number
Takashi Minoshima, Shigenobu Hirose, and Takayoshi Sano

TL;DR
This study investigates how the saturation level of magnetorotational instability (MRI) in MHD turbulence depends on gas pressure and magnetic Prandtl number, highlighting the importance of numerical schemes and physical parameters.
Contribution
It clarifies the dependence of MRI saturation on physical and numerical parameters, emphasizing the role of magnetic Prandtl number over gas pressure in saturated turbulence.
Findings
Saturation level is highly sensitive to numerical magnetic Prandtl number.
In explicit viscosity and resistivity simulations, saturation increases with magnetic Prandtl number.
Saturation level is nearly independent of gas pressure at constant magnetic Prandtl number.
Abstract
A large set of numerical simulations of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence induced by the magnetorotational instability (MRI) is presented. Revisiting the previous survey conducted by Sano et al. (2004), we investigate the gas pressure dependence of the saturation level. In ideal MHD simulations, the gas pressure dependence is found to be very sensitive to the choice of a numerical scheme. This is because the numerical magnetic Prandtl number varies according to the scheme as well as the pressure, which considerably affects the results. The saturation level is more sensitive to the numerical magnetic Prandtl number than the pressure. In MHD simulations with explicit viscosity and resistivity, the saturation level increases with the physical magnetic Prandtl number, and it is almost independent of the gas pressure when the magnetic Prandtl number is constant. This is indicative of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
