A Bright Year for Tidal Disruptions?
Brian D. Metzger, Nicholas C. Stone

TL;DR
This paper proposes a model explaining the optical/UV and X-ray emissions of tidal disruption events (TDEs) by considering outflows and ionization effects, which account for observed luminosities, temperatures, and line widths.
Contribution
It introduces a new model where only a small fraction of debris accretes, leading to outflows that influence TDE emission properties, relaxing previous assumptions about debris fallback.
Findings
Explains low and constant optical temperatures in TDEs.
Predicts X-ray dominated flares for high-mass black holes.
Aligns ejecta velocities with observed emission line widths.
Abstract
When a star is tidally disrupted by a supermassive black hole (BH), roughly half of its mass falls back to the BH at super-Eddington rates. Being tenuously gravitationally bound and unable to cool radiatively, only a small fraction f_in << 1 of the returning debris will likely be incorporated into the disk and accrete, with the vast majority instead becoming unbound in an outflow of velocity ~1e4 km/s. This slow outflow spreads laterally, encasing the BH. For months or longer, the outflow remains sufficiently neutral to block hard EUV and X-ray radiation from the hot inner disk, which instead becomes trapped in a radiation-dominated nebula. Ionizing nebular radiation heats the inner edge of the ejecta to temperatures of T > few 1e4 K, converting the emission to optical/near-UV wavelengths where photons more readily escape due to the lower opacity. This can explain the unexpectedly low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
