The high-redshift gamma-ray burst GRB140515A
A. Melandri, M.G. Bernardini, P. D'Avanzo, R. Sanchez-Ramirez, F., Nappo, L. Nava, J. Japelj, A. de Ugarte Postigo, S. Oates, S. Campana, S., Covino, V. D'Elia, G. Ghirlanda, E. Gafton, G. Ghisellini, N. Gnedin, P., Goldoni, J. Gorosabel, T. Libbrecht, D. Malesani, R. Salvaterra

TL;DR
This study presents a detailed multi-wavelength analysis of the high-redshift gamma-ray burst GRB140515A at z=6.327, revealing a very low-density environment, weak absorption lines, and insights into the intergalactic medium and progenitor star type.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed spectral and light curve analysis of GRB140515A, constraining the neutral hydrogen fraction and environmental properties at high redshift.
Findings
Neutral hydrogen fraction x_HI ≤ 0.002
Weakest absorption lines observed in GRB afterglows
Environment characterized by low density and moderate extinction
Abstract
High-redshift gamma-ray bursts have several advantages for the study of the distant universe, providing unique information about the structure and properties of the galaxies in which they exploded. Spectroscopic identification with large ground-based telescopes has improved our knowledge of the class of such distant events. We present the multi-wavelength analysis of the high- Swift gamma-ray burst GRB140515A (). The best estimate of the neutral hydrogen fraction of the intergalactic medium (IGM) towards the burst is . The spectral absorption lines detected for this event are the weakest lines ever observed in gamma-ray burst afterglows, suggesting that GRB140515A exploded in a very low density environment. Its circum-burst medium is characterised by an average extinction (A) that seems to be typical of events. The observed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
