The non-linear health consequences of living in larger cities
Luis E. C. Rocha, Anna E. Thorson, Renaud Lambiotte

TL;DR
This study investigates how city size affects health outcomes, revealing complex non-linear relationships where larger cities often have lower non-communicable disease mortality but higher infectious disease incidence, challenging assumptions of urban health advantages.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of health-related metrics across cities of different sizes in Brazil, Sweden, and the USA, highlighting non-linear scaling effects and their implications.
Findings
Lower non-communicable disease mortality in larger cities
Higher infectious disease incidence with increasing city size
Urban health advantages are not straightforward or uniform
Abstract
Urbanization promotes economy, mobility, access and availability of resources, but on the other hand, generates higher levels of pollution, violence, crime, and mental distress. The health consequences of the agglomeration of people living close together are not fully understood. Particularly, it remains unclear how variations in the population size across cities impact the health of the population. We analyze the deviations from linearity of the scaling of several health-related quantities, such as the incidence and mortality of diseases, external causes of death, wellbeing, and health-care availability, in respect to the population size of cities in Brazil, Sweden and the USA. We find that deaths by non-communicable diseases tend to be relatively less common in larger cities, whereas the per-capita incidence of infectious diseases is relatively larger for increasing population size.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
