The progenitors of core-collapse supernovae suggest thermonuclear origin for the explosions
Doron Kushnir (IAS)

TL;DR
This paper argues that observational correlations in supernovae support a thermonuclear explosion mechanism (CITE) over the neutrino mechanism, suggesting different progenitor masses for different supernova types.
Contribution
It demonstrates a correlation between nickel mass and kinetic energy across all CCSNe, supporting the CITE model and challenging the neutrino mechanism predictions.
Findings
Correlation between $M_{Ni}$ and $E_{kin}$ observed in all CCSNe types.
Type Ibc supernovae have higher $E_{kin}$ and $M_{Ni}$ than type II-P.
Progenitors of type Ibc may be massive Wolf-Rayet stars.
Abstract
Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are the explosions of massive stars following the collapse of the stars' iron cores. Poznanski (2013) has recently suggested an observational correlation between the ejecta velocities and the inferred masses of the red supergiant progenitors of type II-P explosions, which implies that the kinetic energy of the ejecta () increases with the mass of the progenitor. I point out that the same conclusion can be reached from the model-free observed correlation between the ejected Ni masses () and the luminosities of the progenitors for type II supernovae, which was reported by Fraser et al. (2011). This correlation is in an agreement with the predictions of the collapse-induced thermonuclear explosions (CITE) for CCSNe and in a possible contradiction with the predictions of the neutrino mechanism. I show that a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Neutrino Physics Research · Nuclear physics research studies
