Comment on "Problems with Mannheim's conformal gravity program"
Philip D. Mannheim

TL;DR
This paper critiques Yoon's claims about issues in Mannheim's conformal gravity, demonstrating that their conclusions are based on an invalid assumption that breaks the theory's conformal invariance.
Contribution
It clarifies that Yoon's problems with conformal gravity arise from an assumption that contradicts the theory's fundamental symmetry, invalidating their results.
Findings
Yoon's assumptions violate conformal invariance
Yoon's conclusions are invalidated
The non-relativistic limit remains consistent with conformal gravity
Abstract
Recently in Phys. Rev. D 88, 027504 (2013) Yoon has suggested that there may be problems for the non-relativistic limit of the conformal gravity theory. Here we show that Yoon's results only hold because of the assumption that gravitational sources can be treated the same way that they are treated in standard Newton-Einstein gravity. Since such an assumption violates the theory's underlying conformal invariance,Yoon's conclusions are invalidated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
