Recovering Residual Forensic Data from Smartphone Interactions with Cloud Storage Providers
George Grispos, William Bradley Glisson, Tim Storer

TL;DR
This paper explores how forensic tools can recover residual data from smartphones to aid investigations of cloud storage services, highlighting the potential of end-device data to reveal cloud-stored evidence.
Contribution
It demonstrates that smartphones can provide partial evidence of cloud data, compares recovery effectiveness across app versions, and documents artefacts on iOS and Android devices.
Findings
Smartphones retain data from cloud storage apps.
Multiple device data amalgamation improves evidence completeness.
Different app versions produce varying artefacts and recoverable files.
Abstract
There is a growing demand for cloud storage services such as Dropbox, Box, Syncplicity and SugarSync. These public cloud storage services can store gigabytes of corporate and personal data in remote data centres around the world, which can then be synchronized to multiple devices. This creates an environment which is potentially conducive to security incidents, data breaches and other malicious activities. The forensic investigation of public cloud environments presents a number of new challenges for the digital forensics community. However, it is anticipated that end-devices such as smartphones, will retain data from these cloud storage services. This research investigates how forensic tools that are currently available to practitioners can be used to provide a practical solution for the problems related to investigating cloud storage environments. The research contribution is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
