Ghostly action at a distance: a non-technical explanation of the Bell inequality
Mark G. Alford

TL;DR
This paper provides a simple non-technical explanation of Bell's inequality and discusses how EPR experiment results challenge the principle of strong locality, implying possible faster-than-light influences in nature.
Contribution
It offers an accessible explanation of Bell's inequality and explores its implications for locality, causality, and relativity, clarifying complex quantum concepts for a broader audience.
Findings
EPR experiments violate strong locality principles
Bell's inequality demonstrates non-local correlations in quantum mechanics
Results suggest possible faster-than-light influences in nature
Abstract
We give a simple non-mathematical explanation of Bell's inequality. Using the inequality, we show how the results of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments violate the principle of strong locality, also known as local causality. This indicates, given some reasonable-sounding assumptions, that some sort of faster-than-light influence is present in nature. We discuss the implications, emphasizing the relationship between EPR and the Principle of Relativity, the distinction between causal influences and signals, and the tension between EPR and determinism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
