Preprocessing Among the Infalling Galaxy Population of EDisCS Clusters
Dennis W. Just (1,2), Matthew Kirby (3), Dennis Zaritsky (1), Gregory, Rudnick (4), Tyler Desjardins (4), Richard Cool (5), John Moustakas (6),, Douglas Clowe (7), Gabriella De Lucia (8), Alfonso Aragon-Salamanca (9),, Vandana Desai (10), Rose Finn (11), Claire Halliday (12)

TL;DR
This study investigates galaxy infall and preprocessing in clusters at redshifts 0.4 to 0.8, revealing significant infall rates, environmental effects on galaxy properties, and evidence for galaxy evolution prior to cluster assimilation.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of galaxy infall rates and environmental effects in clusters at intermediate redshifts, highlighting the prevalence of preprocessing before cluster integration.
Findings
30% to 70% of z=0 cluster galaxies are outside the virial radius at z~0.6
Larger red galaxy fraction in infall regions compared to the field
Evidence of galaxy preprocessing affecting star formation rates
Abstract
We present results from a low-resolution spectroscopic survey for 21 galaxy clusters at selected from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey. We measured spectra using the low-dispersion prism in IMACS on the Magellan Baade telescope and calculate redshifts with an accuracy of . We find 1763 galaxies that are brighter than in the large-scale cluster environs. We identify the galaxies expected to be accreted by the clusters as they evolve to using spherical infall models and find that to of the cluster population lies outside the virial radius at . For analogous clusters at , we calculate that the ratio of galaxies that have fallen into the clusters since to those that were already in the core at that redshift is typically between and . This wide range of ratios is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
