The Kapteyn moving group is not tidal debris from $\omega$ Centauri
Camila Navarrete, Julio Chanam\'e, Iv\'an Ram\'irez, Andr\'es Meza,, Guillem Anglada-Escud\'e, Evgenya Shkolnik

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution spectroscopy to test whether the Kapteyn moving group is tidal debris from $ ext{ω}$ Centauri, finding no chemical evidence supporting this origin and suggesting a different formation history.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed chemical abundance analysis of the Kapteyn group, challenging its proposed connection to $ ext{ω}$ Centauri based on chemical signatures.
Findings
No chemical patterns matching $ ext{ω}$ Centauri were found.
The He I 10830 Å line strength is consistent with field stars, indicating no second-generation stars.
The chemical abundance trends disfavor an origin in $ ext{ω}$ Centauri's parent galaxy.
Abstract
The Kapteyn moving group has been postulated as tidal debris from Centauri. If true, members of the group should show some of the chemical abundance patterns known for stars in the cluster. We present an optical and near-infrared high-resolution, high-S/N spectroscopic study of 14 stars of the Kapteyn group, plus 10 additional stars (the Cen-group) that, while not listed as members of the Kapteyn group as originally defined, have been nevertheless associated dynamically with Centauri. Abundances for Na, O, Mg, Al, Ca and Ba were derived from the optical spectra, while the strength of the chromospheric He I 10830 {\AA} line is studied as a possible helium abundance indicator. The resulting Na-O and Mg-Al patterns for stars of the combined Kapteyn and Cen-group samples do not resemble those of Centauri, and are not different from those of field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
