Analytic models of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect for arbitrary eclipser/star size ratios and arbitrary multiline stellar spectra
Roman V. Baluev, Vakhit Sh. Shaidulin

TL;DR
This paper develops an advanced analytic model for the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect that accounts for complex stellar spectra, arbitrary star-planet size ratios, and multiple spectral lines, improving accuracy over previous models.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analytic framework that relaxes previous assumptions, incorporating the entire stellar spectrum and arbitrary size ratios, with applications to real observational data.
Findings
Model maintains accuracy for stellar rotation velocities up to 2-3 times the linewidth.
Application to HD 189733 yields a refined Rossiter-McLaughlin effect model.
Derived a lower estimate for the star's projected rotational velocity, Vsin i.
Abstract
We present an attempt to improve models of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect by relaxing several restrictive assumptions. We consider the entire multiline stellar spectrum rather than just a single line, use no assumptions about the shape of the lines profiles, and allow arbitrary size ratio for the star and its eclipser. However, we neglect the effect of macro-turbulence and differential rotation. We construct our model as a power series in the stellar rotation velocity, , giving a closed set of analytic formulae for up to three terms, and assuming quadratic limb-darkening law. We consider three major approaches of determining the Doppler shift: cross-correlation with a predefined template, cross-correlation with an out-of-transit stellar spectrum, and parametric modelling of the spectrum. A numerical testcase revels that our model preserves good accuracy for the rotation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
