PARSEC evolutionary tracks of massive stars up to $350 M_\odot$ at metallicities 0.0001$\leq Z \leq$0.04
Yang Chen (SISSA&USTC), Alessandro Bressan (SISSA), L\'eo Girardi, (OAPD), Paola Marigo (UNIPD), Xu Kong (USTC), Antonio Lanza (SISSA)

TL;DR
This paper presents new stellar evolutionary tracks for massive stars up to 350 solar masses across a wide metallicity range, incorporating a recent mass-loss formalism that aligns with observed stellar limits and predicts metallicity effects.
Contribution
Introduces updated PARSEC models for massive stars with a novel mass-loss formalism that reproduces observed limits without ad hoc assumptions and covers a broad metallicity spectrum.
Findings
Models reproduce the Humphreys-Davidson limit without ad hoc mass-loss enhancement.
Mass-loss rates become less metallicity-dependent near the Eddington limit.
Humphreys-Davidson limit brightness increases at lower metallicity.
Abstract
We complement the PARSEC data base of stellar evolutionary tracks with new models of massive stars, from the pre-main sequence phase to the central carbon ignition. We consider a broad range of metallicities, 0.00010.04 and initial masses up to . The main difference with respect to our previous models of massive stars is the adoption of a recent formalism accounting for the mass-loss enhancement when the ratio of the stellar to the Eddington luminosity, , approaches unity. With this new formalism, the models are able to reproduce the Humphreys-Davidson limit observed in the Galactic and Large Magellanic Cloud colour-magnitude diagrams, without an ad hoc mass-loss enhancement. We also follow the predictions of recent wind models indicating that the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rates becomes shallower when approaches…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
