Systematic NLTE study of the -2.6 < [Fe/H] < 0.2 F and G dwarfs in the solar neighbourhood. I. Stellar atmosphere parameters
T. Sitnova, G. Zhao, L. Mashonkina, Y.Q. Chen, F. Liu, Yu. Pakhomov,, K. Tan, M. Bolte, S. Alexeeva, F. Grupp, J.-R. Shi, H.-W. Zhang

TL;DR
This study derives homogeneous stellar atmosphere parameters for 51 nearby FG dwarfs across a wide metallicity range using high-resolution spectra and NLTE modeling, improving accuracy for Galactic chemical evolution research.
Contribution
It provides a consistent set of NLTE-based atmospheric parameters for FG dwarfs, validated against benchmark stars, enhancing the precision of stellar and Galactic evolution studies.
Findings
NLTE abundances from Fe I and Fe II lines are consistent within 0.06 dex.
NLTE analysis results in higher surface gravities compared to LTE.
NLTE effects are significant for very metal-poor and turn-off stars, with log g shifts up to 0.5 dex.
Abstract
We present atmospheric parameters for 51 nearby FG dwarfs uniformly distributed over the -2.60 < [Fe/H] < +0.20 metallicity range that is suitable for the Galactic chemical evolution research. Lines of iron, Fe I and Fe II, were used to derive a homogeneous set of effective temperatures, surface gravities, iron abundances, and microturbulence velocities. We used high-resolution (R>60000) Shane/Hamilton and CFHT/ESPaDOnS observed spectra and non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE) line formation for Fe I and Fe II in the classical 1D model atmospheres. The spectroscopic method was tested with the 20 benchmark stars, for which there are multiple measurements of the infrared flux method (IRFM) Teff and their Hipparcos parallax error is < 10%. We found NLTE abundances from lines of Fe I and Fe II to be consistent within 0.06 dex for every benchmark star, when applying a scaling factor of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
