
TL;DR
This paper introduces a more flexible definition of linking systems for fusion systems by defining subcentric subgroups, leading to a unique subcentric linking system that is homotopy equivalent to the classical centric one, potentially aiding classification.
Contribution
It proposes a generalized concept of linking systems using subcentric subgroups, expanding the objects beyond quasicentric subgroups, and proves the existence and uniqueness of such systems.
Findings
Existence of a unique subcentric linking system for each saturated fusion system.
Homotopy equivalence between the nerve of subcentric and centric linking systems.
Potential for new classification methods for fusion systems of characteristic p-type.
Abstract
Linking systems are crucial for studying the homotopy theory of fusion systems, but are also of interest from an algebraic point of view. We propose a definition of a linking system associated to a saturated fusion system which is more general than the one currently in the literature and thus allows a more flexible choice of objects of linking systems. More precisely, we define subcentric subgroups of fusion systems in a way that every quasicentric subgroup of a saturated fusion system is subcentric. Whereas the objects of linking systems in the current definition are always quasicentric, the objects of our linking systems only need to be subcentric. We prove that, associated to each saturated fusion system , there is a unique linking system whose objects are the subcentric subgroups of . Furthermore, the nerve of such a subcentric linking system is homotopy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
