The sizes of massive quiescent and star forming galaxies at z~4 with ZFOURGE and CANDELS
Caroline M. S. Straatman, Ivo Labbe, Lee R. Spitler, Karl Glazebrook,, Adam Tomczak, Rebecca Allen, Gabriel B. Brammer, Michael Cowley, Pieter van, Dokkum, Glenn G. Kacprzak, Lalit Kawinwanichakij, Nicola Mehrtens, Themiya, Nanayakkara, Casey Papovich, S. Eric Persson

TL;DR
This study examines the sizes of massive quiescent and star-forming galaxies at z~4, revealing that quiescent galaxies are extremely compact, with significant size evolution observed from lower redshifts, and that compact star-forming galaxies are rare at this epoch.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurement of galaxy sizes at z~4 using HST data, highlighting the rapid evolution and rarity of compact star-forming galaxies at high redshift.
Findings
Quiescent galaxies at z~4 are very compact, median size ~0.63 kpc.
Star-forming galaxies are larger, median size ~2.0 kpc.
Size evolution follows a power-law with redshift, r_e ∝ (1+z)^(-1.44) for quiescent galaxies.
Abstract
We study the rest-frame ultra-violet sizes of massive (~0.8 x 10^11 M_Sun) galaxies at 3.4<z<4.2, selected from the FourStar Galaxy Evolution Survey (ZFOURGE), by fitting single Sersic profiles to HST/WFC3/F160W images from the Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS). Massive quiescent galaxies are very compact, with a median circularized half-light radius r_e = 0.63 +/- 0.18 kpc. Removing 5/16 (31%) sources with signs of AGN activity does not change the result. Star-forming galaxies have r_e = 2.0 +/- 0.60 kpc, 3.2 +/- 1.3 x larger than quiescent galaxies. Quiescent galaxies at z~4 are on average 6.0 +\- 0.17 x smaller than at z~0 and 1.9 +/- 0.7 x smaller than at z~2. Star-forming galaxies of the same stellar mass are 2.4 +/- 0.7 x smaller than at z~0. Overall, the size evolution at 0<z<4 is well described by a powerlaw, with r_e = 5.08 +/- 0.28…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
