The Impossibly Early Galaxy Problem

TL;DR

This paper examines the discrepancy between observed early massive galaxies at high redshifts and theoretical predictions, highlighting persistent tensions even after accounting for systematic uncertainties.

Contribution

It analyzes systematics and formation scenarios to reconcile observations of early massive galaxies with hierarchical galaxy formation models.

Findings

Significant tension remains between observations and $ m extit{ extbf{Λ}}$CDM predictions.

Systematic uncertainties can reduce but not eliminate the discrepancy.

High-redshift massive halos are more abundant than current models predict.

Abstract

The current hierarchical merging paradigm and $\Lambda$CDM predict that the $z \sim 4-8$ universe should be a time in which the most massive galaxies are transitioning from their initial halo assembly to the later baryonic evolution seen in star-forming galaxies and quasars. However, no evidence of this transition has been found in many high redshift galaxy surveys including CFHTLS, CANDELS and SPLASH, the first studies to probe the high-mass end at these redshifts. Indeed, if halo mass to stellar mass ratios estimated at lower-redshift continue to $z \sim 6-8$, CANDELS and SPLASH report several orders of magnitude more $M \sim 10^{12-13} M_\odot$ halos than are possible to have formed by those redshifts, implying these massive galaxies formed impossibly early. We consider various systematics in the stellar synthesis models used to estimate physical parameters and possible galaxy formation scenarios in an effort to reconcile observation with theory. Although known uncertainties can greatly reduce the disparity between recent observations and cold dark matter merger simulations, even taking the most conservative view of the observations, there remains considerable tension with current theory.