Hardy is (almost) everywhere: nonlocality without inequalities for almost all entangled multipartite states
Samson Abramsky, Carmen M. Constantin, Shenggang Ying

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that almost all entangled multipartite qubit states exhibit Hardy-type nonlocality proofs without inequalities, providing a constructive method and an efficient algorithm to identify local observables that reveal this nonlocality.
Contribution
The authors establish that nearly all multipartite entangled states admit Hardy-type nonlocality proofs and provide a constructive, algorithmic approach to find the necessary local observables.
Findings
All entangled states except certain tensor products admit Hardy-type proofs.
A simple algorithm can produce the witnessing observables for nonlocality.
Only n+2 local observables are needed to demonstrate nonlocality for n-qubit states.
Abstract
We show that all -qubit entangled states, with the exception of tensor products of single-qubit and bipartite maximally-entangled states, admit Hardy-type proofs of non-locality without inequalities or probabilities. More precisely, we show that for all such states, there are local, one-qubit observables such that the resulting probability tables are logically contextual in the sense of Abramsky and Brandenburger, this being the general form of the Hardy-type property. Moreover, our proof is constructive: given a state, we show how to produce the witnessing local observables. In fact, we give an algorithm to do this. Although the algorithm is reasonably straightforward, its proof of correctness is non-trivial. A further striking feature is that we show that local observables suffice to witness the logical contextuality of any -qubit state: two each for two for the parties,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
