A Note on Physical Mass and the Thermodynamics of AdS-Kerr Black Holes
Brett McInnes, Yen Chin Ong

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the proper definition of mass for AdS-Kerr black holes, showing that using the physical mass E resolves apparent violations of the second law of thermodynamics related to horizon area changes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the correct physical mass to use in thermodynamic considerations of AdS-Kerr black holes is E, not M, resolving paradoxes in horizon area behavior.
Findings
Horizon area increases with angular momentum if M is fixed.
Using the physical mass E, the horizon area decreases with angular momentum.
The physical mass E aligns with the First Law of black hole thermodynamics.
Abstract
As with any black hole, asymptotically anti-de Sitter Kerr black holes are described by a small number of parameters, including a "mass parameter" that reduces to the AdS-Schwarzschild mass in the limit of vanishing angular momentum. In sharp contrast to the asymptotically flat case, the horizon area of such a black hole increases with the angular momentum parameter if one fixes , this appears to mean that the Penrose process in this case would violate the Second Law of black hole thermodynamics. We show that the correct procedure is to fix not but rather the "physical" mass , this is motivated by the First Law. For then the horizon area decreases with . We recommend that always be used as the mass in physical processes: for example, in attempts to "over-spin" AdS-Kerr black holes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
