Theoretical Geometry, Critical Theory, and Concept Spaces in IR
Laura Sjoberg, Kevin Knudson

TL;DR
This paper applies persistent homology to analyze democracy data, revealing that mature democracies form a unified cluster while authoritarian regimes split into distinct groups based on different factors.
Contribution
It introduces the use of persistent homology in political science to uncover structural patterns in democracy and authoritarianism data.
Findings
Mature democracies form a single connected component.
Authoritarian countries cluster into multiple groups.
Several 2-dimensional homology classes reveal connections among countries.
Abstract
We use the theory of persistent homology to analyze a data set arising from the study of various aspects of democracy. Our results show that most "mature" democracies look more or less the same, in the sense that they form a single connected component in the data set, while more authoritarian countries cluster into groups depending on various factors. For example, we find several distinct -dimensional homology classes in the set, uncovering connections among the countries representing the vertices in the representative cycles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Political Conflict and Governance · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
