On the Higgs-Confinement Complementarity
Erhard Seiler

TL;DR
This paper clarifies that Higgs-confinement complementarity is consistent and not paradoxical, reaffirming the mathematical and physical validity of the concept in gauge theories.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis confirming the absence of paradoxes and mathematical flaws in the Higgs-confinement complementarity argument.
Findings
No paradox exists in Higgs-confinement transition
Mathematical reasoning supporting complementarity is sound
Higgs and confinement regimes are smoothly connected
Abstract
It has been noticed long ago that in Higgs models with `complete symmetry breaking' one can move from the confinement to the Higgs regime without crossing a phase boundary, a fact sometimes called referred to as `complementarity'. In a recent paper some doubt was raised about the correctness of the mathematics underlying this fact and it was claimed that the supposed `flaw' would resolve the `paradox' seen in this complementarity. Here we briefly revisit the facts both from a mathematical and a physical point of view and point out that (a) there is no paradox and (b) there is no flaw in the mathematical reasoning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
