A Bayesian nonparametric approach to testing for dependence between random variables
Sarah Filippi, Chris Holmes

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian nonparametric method using Polya tree priors to test for dependence between random variables, providing explicit probabilities and advantages over traditional measures.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian nonparametric approach that explicitly quantifies dependence with posterior probabilities, accommodating uncertainty and enabling formal decision analysis.
Findings
Provides explicit posterior probability of dependence
Allows comparison of evidence across studies
Quantifies changes in dependence under different conditions
Abstract
Nonparametric and nonlinear measures of statistical dependence between pairs of random variables are important tools in modern data analysis. In particular the emergence of large data sets can now support the relaxation of linearity assumptions implicit in traditional association scores such as correlation. Here we describe a Bayesian nonparametric procedure that leads to a tractable, explicit and analytic quantification of the relative evidence for dependence vs independence. Our approach uses Polya tree priors on the space of probability measures which can then be embedded within a decision theoretic test for dependence. Polya tree priors can accommodate known uncertainty in the form of the underlying sampling distribution and provides an explicit posterior probability measure of both dependence and independence. Well known advantages of having an explicit probability measure include:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
