Covariant Hamiltonian Field Theories on Manifolds with Boundary: Yang-Mills Theories
Alberto Ibort (Univ. Carlos III de Madrid), Amelia Spivak (UC, Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper extends multisymplectic formalism to covariant Hamiltonian field theories on manifolds with boundaries, providing a geometric framework for boundary conditions, phase space reduction, and quantization, with applications to Yang-Mills and other theories.
Contribution
It develops a geometric multisymplectic framework for boundary conditions in covariant Hamiltonian field theories, including gauge theories like Yang-Mills.
Findings
Boundary conditions arise from the moment map of the gauge group.
The reduced phase space is a symplectic manifold with an isotropic boundary submanifold.
The framework is validated on scalar fields, Poisson sigma-model, and Yang-Mills theories.
Abstract
The multisymplectic formalism of field theories developed by many mathematicians over the last fifty years is extended in this work to deal with manifolds that have boundaries. In particular, we develop a multisymplectic framework for first order covariant Hamiltonian field theories on manifolds with boundaries. This work is a geometric fulfillment of Fock's characterization of field theories as it appears in recent work by Cattaneo, Mnev and Reshetikhin [Ca14]. This framework leads to a true geometric understanding of conventional choices for boundary conditions. For example, the boundary condition that the pull-back of the 1-form on the cotangent space of fields at the boundary vanish, i.e. \pi * \alpha = 0 , is shown to be a consequence of our finding that the boundary fields of the theory lie in the 0-level set of the moment map of the gauge group of the theory. It is also shown…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
