Study on differences between high contrast grating reflectors for TM and TE polarizations and their impact on VCSEL designs
Il-Sug Chung

TL;DR
This theoretical study compares TM and TE high contrast grating reflectors, revealing polarization-dependent differences in structure and mode extension that impact the design of ultrahigh speed VCSELs.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the polarization-dependent properties of HCG reflectors, guiding improved VCSEL design for high-speed applications.
Findings
TM HCGs have thicker gratings and smaller periods than TE HCGs.
TM HCGs exhibit shorter evanescent mode extension, enabling shorter cavity lengths.
Polarization differences are due to boundary condition variations for electric fields.
Abstract
A theoretical study of differences in broadband high-index-contrast grating (HCG) reflectors for TM and TE polarizations is presented, covering various grating parameters and properties of HCGs. It is shown that the HCG reflectors for TM polarization (TM HCG reflectors) have much thicker grating thicknesses and smaller grating periods than the TE HCG reflectors. This difference is found to originate from the different boundary conditions met for the electric field of each polarization. Due to this difference, the TM HCG reflectors have much shorter evanescent extension of HCG modes into low-refractive-index media surrounding the HCG. This enables to achieve a very short effective cavity length for VCSELs, which is essential for ultrahigh speed VCSELs and MEMS-tunable VCSELs. The obtained understandings on polarization dependences will be able to serve as important design guidelines for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
