Planck 2015 results. V. LFI calibration
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont,, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, P. Battaglia, E., Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M., Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi

TL;DR
This paper details the calibration process of the Planck LFI data using the orbital dipole, resulting in improved temperature maps and reduced discrepancies with WMAP measurements, with calibration uncertainties below 0.35%.
Contribution
It introduces an independent Solar dipole estimate and an improved calibration pipeline for Planck LFI, enhancing map accuracy and consistency with WMAP.
Findings
LFI calibration uncertainty reduced to below 0.35%.
LFI maps increased by up to 0.82% in temperature compared to 2013.
Independent Solar dipole estimate consistent with WMAP.
Abstract
We present a description of the pipeline used to calibrate the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) timelines into thermodynamic temperatures for the Planck 2015 data release, covering four years of uninterrupted operations. As in the 2013 data release, our calibrator is provided by the spin-synchronous modulation of the cosmic microwave background dipole, but we now use the orbital component, rather than adopting the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) solar dipole. This allows our 2015 LFI analysis to provide an independent Solar dipole estimate, which is in excellent agreement with that of HFI and within (0.3% in amplitude) of the WMAP value. This 0.3% shift in the peak-to-peak dipole temperature from WMAP and a global overhaul of the iterative calibration code increases the overall level of the LFI maps by 0.45% (30 GHz), 0.64% (44 GHz), and 0.82% (70 GHz) in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
