The second Dirichlet coefficient starts out negative
David W. Farmer, Sally Koutsoliotas

TL;DR
This paper explores why classical modular forms of small weight and low level often have negative second Fourier coefficients, linking this phenomenon to properties of their associated L-functions.
Contribution
It provides an explanation for the observed negativity of the second Fourier coefficient in certain modular forms based on their L-functions.
Findings
Small weight, low level modular forms tend to have negative second Fourier coefficients.
Elliptic curve labeling schemes correlate with the rank of the curve.
L-functions explain the negativity phenomenon.
Abstract
Classical modular forms of small weight and low level are likely to have a negative second Fourier coefficient. Similarly, the labeling scheme for elliptic curves tends to give smaller labels to the higher-rank curves. These observations are easily made when browsing the L-functions and Modular Forms Database, available at http://www.LMFDB.org/. An explanation lies in the L-functions associated to these objects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Analytic Number Theory Research
