Limits of Kalman Filter application in heavy tailed problems
Valentin Konakov, Pavel Mozgunov

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Kalman Filter estimates perform with heavy-tailed distributions, revealing significant errors when deviations from Gaussian assumptions occur, and compares MLE and EM methods for parameter estimation.
Contribution
It analyzes the impact of heavy-tailed noise on Kalman Filter accuracy and compares MLE and EM estimation methods under these conditions.
Findings
Large deviations from Gaussian noise increase estimation errors
EM estimation accounts for noise covariance better than MLE in heavy-tailed cases
Kalman Filter performance degrades with heavy-tailed noise distributions
Abstract
In this paper we consider the behavior of Kalman Filter state estimates in the case of distribution with heavy tails .The simulated linear state space models with Gaussian measurement noises were used. Gaussian noises in state equation are replaced by components with alpha-stable distribution with di erent parameters alpha and beta. We consider the case when "all parameters are known" and two methods of parameters estimation are compared: the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and the expectation- maximization algorithm (EM). It was shown that in cases of large deviation from Gaussian distribution the total error of states estimation rises dramatically. We conjecture that it can be explained by underestimation of the state equation noises covariance matrix that can be taken into account through the EM parameters estimation and ignored in the case of ML estimation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
