Comparison of the magneto-Peltier and magneto-Seebeck effects in magnetic tunnel junctions
J. Shan, F. K. Dejene, J. C. Leutenantsmeyer, J. Flipse, M., M\"unzenberg, B. J. van Wees

TL;DR
This study investigates the magneto-Peltier effect in magnetic tunnel junctions, demonstrating its reciprocal relationship with the magneto-Seebeck effect, and estimates its magnitude, paving the way for programmable thermoelectric devices.
Contribution
It is the first experimental study of the magneto-Peltier effect in MTJs, showing its linear and nonlinear behaviors and confirming Onsager reciprocity with magneto-Seebeck measurements.
Findings
Magneto-Peltier signal scales linearly with current at small bias.
Enhanced magneto-Peltier effect observed at large bias due to Joule heating.
Estimated magneto-Peltier coefficient of 13.4 mV in the linear regime.
Abstract
Understanding heat generation and transport processes in a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) is a significant step towards improving its application in current memory devices. Recent work has experimentally demonstrated the magneto-Seebeck effect in MTJs, where the Seebeck coefficient of the junction varies as the magnetic configuration changes from a parallel (P) to an anti-parallel (AP) configuration. Here we report the study on its as-yet-unexplored reciprocal effect, the magneto-Peltier effect, where the heat flow carried by the tunneling electrons is altered by changing the magnetic configuration of the MTJ. The magneto-Peltier signal that reflects the change in the temperature difference across the junction between the P and AP configurations scales linearly with the applied current in the small bias but is greatly enhanced in the large bias regime, due to higher-order Joule heating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
