Affine manifolds are rigid analytic spaces in characteristic one, I
Andrew W. Macpherson

TL;DR
This paper extends the framework of schemes relative to monoids with zero to formal schemes, enabling new models for degenerating Abelian varieties and providing combinatorial classifications and criteria within formal geometry.
Contribution
It introduces a formal scheme framework for monoid-based schemes, including models for degenerating Abelian varieties, and offers combinatorial classification and algebraisation criteria.
Findings
Normal formal monoid schemes classified by cone complexes
Provided algebraisation criterion for formal schemes
Reformulated separated and proper morphisms in formal geometry
Abstract
I extend the definitions of schemes relative to monoids with zero - and therefore, toric geometry - to the world of formal schemes. This expands the usual framework to include, for instance, models for Mumford's degenerating Abelian varieties. Following the usual toric paradigm, normal formal monoid schemes can be classified in terms of certain cone complexes, and their properties understood in combinatorial terms. I use this to give a simple algebraisation criterion. I also reformulate the traditional notions of separated and proper morphism in a manner amenable to the context of relative formal geometry, and give characterisations in terms of the topology of cone complexes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
