Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Constraints on its origin from OSIRIS observations
H. Rickman (1,2), S. Marchi (3), M. F. A'Hearn (4), C. Barbieri (5),, M. R. El-Maarry (6), C. G\"uttler (7), W.-H. Ip (8), H. U. Keller (9), P., Lamy (10), F. Marzari (5), M. Massironi (11,12), G. Naletto (12,13,14), M., Pajola (12), H. Sierks (7)

TL;DR
This study uses OSIRIS data to explore the origin and evolution of comet 67P, suggesting it formed from two distinct objects that gently merged, providing insights into comet formation and solar system history.
Contribution
It presents a detailed analysis of 67P's shape, features, and collisional history, proposing a contact binary origin from two separate objects formed in the early solar system.
Findings
67P's lobes are from two distinct objects that merged gently.
Most comets of similar size are likely collisional fragments.
Primordial signatures in 67P support early solar system formation models.
Abstract
One of the main aims of the ESA Rosetta mission is to study the origin of the solar system by exploring comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at close range. In this paper we discuss the origin and evolution of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in relation to that of comets in general and in the framework of current solar system formation models. We use data from the OSIRIS scientific cameras as basic constraints. In particular, we discuss the overall bi-lobate shape and the presence of key geological features, such as layers and fractures. We also treat the problem of collisional evolution of comet nuclei by a particle-in-a-box calculation for an estimate of the probability of survival for 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during the early epochs of the solar system. We argue that the two lobes of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko nucleus are derived from two distinct objects that have formed a contact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
