On the Quirks of Maximum Parsimony and Likelihood on Phylogenetic Networks
Christopher Bryant, Mareike Fischer, Simone Linz, Charles, Semple

TL;DR
This paper explores the extension of maximum parsimony methods from phylogenetic trees to networks, analyzing their properties and computational complexity, and comparing them to likelihood-based approaches in evolutionary studies.
Contribution
It provides the first polynomial-time algorithm for softwired maximum parsimony networks and shows that hardwired maximum parsimony networks always include at least one phylogenetic tree.
Findings
Polynomial-time algorithm for softwired maximum parsimony networks
Hardwired maximum parsimony networks always contain a phylogenetic tree
Analysis of parallels between parsimony and likelihood concepts on networks
Abstract
Maximum parsimony is one of the most frequently-discussed tree reconstruction methods in phylogenetic estimation. However, in recent years it has become more and more apparent that phylogenetic trees are often not sufficient to describe evolution accurately. For instance, processes like hybridization or lateral gene transfer that are commonplace in many groups of organisms and result in mosaic patterns of relationships cannot be represented by a single phylogenetic tree. This is why phylogenetic networks, which can display such events, are becoming of more and more interest in phylogenetic research. It is therefore necessary to extend concepts like maximum parsimony from phylogenetic trees to networks. Several suggestions for possible extensions can be found in recent literature, for instance the softwired and the hardwired parsimony concepts. In this paper, we analyze the so-called big…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
