New results on inconsistency indices and their relationship with the quality of priority vector estimation
Andrzej Z. Grzybowski

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of various inconsistency indices in pairwise comparison matrices for estimating priority vectors, clarifying their interpretability and proposing a new inconsistency measure with a statistical acceptance approach.
Contribution
It distinguishes between different types of inconsistency measurement tasks and introduces a new inconsistency index linked to priority vector estimation quality.
Findings
Monte Carlo experiments show the relationship between indices and estimation accuracy
A new inconsistency measure is proposed based on statistical principles
Guidelines for selecting appropriate inconsistency indices in decision making
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of inconsistency in the pairwise comparisons based prioritization methodology. The issue of "inconsistency" in this context has gained much attention in recent years. The literature provides us with a number of different "inconsistency" indices suggested for measuring the inconsistency of the pairwise comparison matrix (PCM). The latter is understood as a deviation of the PCM from the "consistent case" - a notion that is formally well-defined in this theory. However the usage of the indices is justified only by some heuristics. It is still unclear what they really "measure". What is even more important and still not known is the relationship between their values and the "consistency" of the decision maker's judgments on one hand, and the prioritization results upon the other. We provide examples showing that it is necessary to distinguish between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
