Concrete resource analysis of the quantum linear system algorithm used to compute the electromagnetic scattering cross section of a 2D target
Artur Scherer, Beno\^it Valiron, Siun-Chuon Mau, Scott Alexander, Eric, van den Berg, and Thomas E. Chapuran

TL;DR
This paper provides detailed estimates of the quantum resources needed to implement the quantum linear system algorithm for a large problem size, highlighting the substantial complexity and resource demands involved.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive logical resource analysis of QLSA for electromagnetic scattering, including circuit width, depth, and gate counts, using both manual and automated methods.
Findings
Estimated circuit width of ~340 for accuracy 0.01 without oracle costs.
Estimated circuit depth of ~10^25 without oracle costs.
Oracle resources significantly increase the overall resource requirements.
Abstract
We provide a detailed estimate for the logical resource requirements of the quantum linear system algorithm (QLSA) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009)] including the recently described elaborations [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 250504 (2013)]. Our resource estimates are based on the standard quantum-circuit model of quantum computation; they comprise circuit width, circuit depth, the number of qubits and ancilla qubits employed, and the overall number of elementary quantum gate operations as well as more specific gate counts for each elementary fault-tolerant gate from the standard set {X, Y, Z, H, S, T, CNOT}. To perform these estimates, we used an approach that combines manual analysis with automated estimates generated via the Quipper quantum programming language and compiler. Our estimates pertain to the example problem size N=332,020,680 beyond which, according to a crude big-O…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
