GLEAM: The GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky MWA survey
R. B. Wayth, E. Lenc, M. E. Bell, J. R. Callingham, K. S. Dwarakanath,, T. M. O. Franzen, B.-Q. For, B. Gaensler, P. Hancock, L. Hindson, N., Hurley-Walker, C. A. Jackson, M. Johnston-Hollitt, A. D. Kapinska, B., McKinley, J. Morgan, A. R. Offringa, P. Procopio

TL;DR
GLEAM is an extensive radio sky survey using the Murchison Widefield Array, covering frequencies 72-231 MHz, providing detailed imaging, sensitivity analysis, and addressing observational challenges over two years.
Contribution
This paper introduces the GLEAM survey methodology, data acquisition strategies, and sensitivity analysis, highlighting improvements in wide-field radio imaging at low frequencies.
Findings
Achieved ~2.5 arcmin resolution at 154 MHz
Provided sensitivity estimates for different observing setups
Addressed ionospheric and instrumental polarization challenges
Abstract
GLEAM, the GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky MWA survey, is a survey of the entire radio sky south of declination +25 deg at frequencies between 72 and 231 MHz, made with the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) using a drift scan method that makes efficient use of the MWA's very large field-of-view. We present the observation details, imaging strategies and theoretical sensitivity for GLEAM. The survey ran for two years, the first year using 40 kHz frequency resolution and 0.5 s time resolution; the second year using 10 kHz frequency resolution and 2 s time resolution. The resulting image resolution and sensitivity depends on observing frequency, sky pointing and image weighting scheme. At 154 MHz the image resolution is approximately 2.5 x 2.2/cos(DEC+26.7) arcmin with sensitivity to structures up to ~10 deg in angular size. We provide tables to calculate the expected thermal noise for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
