Stability and Coalescence of Massive Twin Binaries
Jason A. Hwang, James C. Lombardi Jr., Frederic A. Rasio, Vassiliki, Kalogera

TL;DR
This paper investigates the evolution and stability of massive twin binary stars, focusing on their potential to become double neutron star systems through common envelope phases and analyzing the conditions for their survival.
Contribution
It combines stellar evolution modeling with hydrodynamic simulations to determine the stability limits and ejection efficiencies of massive twin binaries during common envelope evolution.
Findings
Minimum mass ratio for twin binaries to undergo double-core evolution is approximately 0.933.
Largest orbital separation for dynamical stability depends on component mass and age.
Helium core survival is possible at certain orbital separations, leading to double neutron star progenitors.
Abstract
Massive stars are usually found in binaries, and binaries with periods less than 10 days may have a preference for near equal component masses. In this paper we investigate the evolution of these binaries all the way to contact and the possibility that these systems can be progenitors of double neutron star binaries. The small orbital separations of observed double neutron star binaries suggest that the progenitor systems underwent a common envelope phase at least once during their evolution. Bethe & Brown (1998) proposed that massive binary twins will undergo a common envelope evolution while both components are ascending the red giant branch or asymptotic giant branch simultaneously, also known as double-core evolution. Using models generated from the stellar evolution code Evolve Zero Age Main Sequence, we determine the range of mass ratios resulting in both components simultaneously…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
