Revisiting the original Morphology-Density Relation
R. C. W. Houghton

TL;DR
This paper revisits the original morphology-density relation, refining it by considering local galaxy densities and their impact on elliptical and early-type galaxy distributions within clusters.
Contribution
It provides new insights into how local and average densities influence galaxy morphology distributions, extending Dressler's original relation with refined analysis.
Findings
Elliptical fraction depends on local density and cluster average density.
The overall elliptical to early-type ratio remains around 30%, independent of average density.
Clusters with higher elliptical fractions tend to have lower average local densities.
Abstract
In light of recent findings from the kinematic morphology-density relation, we investigate whether the same trends exist in the original morphology density relation, using the same data as Dressler. In addition to Dressler's canonical relations, we find that further refinements are possible when considering the average local projected density of galaxies in a cluster. Firstly, the distribution of ellipticals in a cluster depends on the relative local density of galaxies in that cluster: equivalent rises in the elliptical fraction occur at higher local densities for clusters with higher average local densities. This is not true for the late-type fraction, where the variation with local density within a cluster is independent of the average local density of galaxies in that cluster, and is as Dressler originally found. Furthermore, the overall ratio of ellipticals to early-types in a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
