Bayesian model selection in logistic regression for the detection of adverse drug reactions
Matthieu Marbac, Pascale Tubert-Bitter, Mohammed Sedki

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian model selection approach using Metropolis-Hastings for logistic regression to improve detection of adverse drug reactions in pharmacovigilance data, avoiding penalty calibration issues.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian model selection method for logistic regression that enhances adverse drug reaction detection without needing penalty calibration.
Findings
Outperforms traditional methods in positive and negative control detection.
Avoids penalty calibration by using BIC-based model selection.
Recommended for parallel use with existing pharmacovigilance measures.
Abstract
Motivation: Spontaneous adverse event reports have a high potential for detecting adverse drug reactions. However, due to their dimension, exploring such databases requires statistical methods. In this context, disproportionality measures are used. However, by projecting the data onto contingency tables, these methods become sensitive to the problem of co-prescriptions and masking effects. Recently, logistic regressions have been used with a Lasso type penalty to perform the detection of associations between drugs and adverse events. However, the choice of the penalty value is open to criticism while it strongly influences the results. Results: In this paper, we propose to use a logistic regression whose sparsity is viewed as a model selection challenge. Since the model space is huge, a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm carries out the model selection by maximizing the BIC criterion. Thus,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
