Galaxy shapes and alignments in the MassiveBlack-II hydrodynamic and dark matter-only simulations
Ananth Tenneti, Rachel Mandelbaum, Tiziana Di Matteo, Alina Kiessling,, Nishikanta Khandai

TL;DR
This study compares galaxy shapes and alignments in hydrodynamic and dark matter-only simulations, revealing baryonic physics' significant impact on galaxy morphology and intrinsic alignments, with implications for modeling galaxy-halo relationships.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of galaxy shape and alignment differences between hydrodynamic and dark matter-only simulations, highlighting baryonic effects on galaxy morphology.
Findings
Dark matter subhalos are rounder in hydrodynamic simulations.
Stellar matter in low-mass galaxies is more misaligned with dark matter halos.
Alignment with inner halo regions is stronger in hydrodynamic simulations.
Abstract
We compare the shapes and intrinsic alignments of galaxies in the MassiveBlack-II cosmological hydrodynamic simulation (MBII) to those in a dark matter-only (DMO) simulation performed with the same volume (100Mpc), cosmological parameters, and initial conditions. Understanding the impact of baryonic physics on galaxy shapes and alignments and their relation to the dark matter distribution should prove useful to map the intrinsic alignments of galaxies from hydrodynamic to dark matter-only simulations. We find that dark matter subhalos are typically rounder in MBII, and the shapes of stellar matter in low mass galaxies are more misaligned with the shapes of the dark matter of the corresponding subhalos in the DMO simulation. At , the fractional difference in the mean misalignment angle between MBII and DMO simulations varies from in the mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
