Stellar activity mimics a habitable-zone planet around Kapteyn's star
Paul Robertson (1, 2), Arpita Roy (1, 2, 3), and Suvrath, Mahadevan (1, 2, 3) ((1) Dept. of Astronomy, Astrophysics, Penn, State University, (2) Center for Exoplanets & Habitable Worlds, Penn State, University, (3) The Penn State Astrobiology Research Center)

TL;DR
This study shows that the supposed habitable-zone planet around Kapteyn's star is actually an artifact caused by stellar activity, not a real planetary signal, emphasizing the importance of activity analysis in exoplanet detection.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that stellar activity can mimic planetary signals in radial velocity data, leading to false planet detections, and provides a detailed analysis of Kapteyn's star to illustrate this.
Findings
Kapteyn's star has a 143-day rotation period.
Spectral activity indices correlate with the 48-day RV signal.
The 48-day signal is an artifact of stellar activity, not a planet.
Abstract
Kapteyn's star is an old M subdwarf believed to be a member of the Galactic halo population of stars. A recent study has claimed the existence of two super-Earth planets around the star based on radial velocity (RV) observations. The innermost of these candidate planets--Kapteyn b (P = 48 days)--resides within the circumstellar habitable zone. Given recent progress in understanding the impact of stellar activity in detecting planetary signals, we have analyzed the observed HARPS data for signatures of stellar activity. We find that while Kapteyn's star is photometrically very stable, a suite of spectral activity indices reveals a large-amplitude rotation signal, and we determine the stellar rotation period to be 143 days. The spectral activity tracers are strongly correlated with the purported RV signal of "planet b," and the 48-day period is an integer fraction (1/3) of the stellar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
