The Intrafirm Complexity of Systemically Important Financial Institutions
Robin L. Lumsdaine, Daniel N. Rockmore, Nicholas Foti, Gregory Leibon,, J. Doyne Farmer

TL;DR
This paper proposes a network-based measure of financial institutions' complexity using control hierarchies, aiding in SIFI designation and potentially guiding firms to manage their complexity levels.
Contribution
It introduces a novel quantitative approach to measure firm complexity through control hierarchy networks, enhancing SIFI identification and regulatory assessment.
Findings
SIFIs have decreased their complexity over the past two years.
Control hierarchy metrics provide a consistent complexity comparison across firms.
The approach offers a foundation for firms to manage and reduce complexity.
Abstract
In November, 2011, the Financial Stability Board, in collaboration with the International Monetary Fund, published a list of 29 "systemically important financial institutions" (SIFIs). This designation reflects a concern that the failure of any one of them could have dramatic negative consequences for the global economy and is based on "their size, complexity, and systemic interconnectedness". While the characteristics of "size" and "systemic interconnectedness" have been the subject of a good deal of quantitative analysis, less attention has been paid to measures of a firm's "complexity." In this paper we take on the challenges of measuring the complexity of a financial institution and to that end explore the use of the structure of an individual firm's control hierarchy as a proxy for institutional complexity. The control hierarchy is a network representation of the institution and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
