Models of red giants in the CoRoT asteroseismology fields combining asteroseismic and spectroscopic constraints
N. Lagarde, A. Miglio, P. Eggenberger, T. Morel, J. Montalb\'an, B., Mosser, T. S. Rodrigues, L. Girardi, M. Rainer, E. Poretti, C. Barban, S., Hekker, T. Kallinger, M. Valentini, F. Carrier, M. Hareter, L. Mantegazza, Y., Elsworth, E. Michel, A. Baglin

TL;DR
This study combines asteroseismic and spectroscopic data to evaluate stellar evolution models of red giants, highlighting the importance of additional constraints like rotation rates and period spacing for improved model testing.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of theoretical models with observations of red giants, incorporating effects of rotation and thermohaline mixing, and discusses the limitations and future needs for model validation.
Findings
Models with thermohaline instability and rotation match observed chemical properties.
Seismic and Hipparcos distances are consistent within uncertainties.
Larger datasets from Kepler or Plato are needed for robust ensemble asteroseismology.
Abstract
Context. The availability of asteroseismic constraints for a large sample of red giant stars from the CoRoT and Kepler missions paves the way for various statistical studies of the seismic properties of stellar populations. Aims. We use the first detailed spectroscopic study of 19 CoRoT red-giant stars (Morel et al 2014) to compare theoretical stellar evolution models to observations of the open cluster NGC 6633 and field stars. Methods. In order to explore the effects of rotation-induced mixing and thermohaline instability, we compare surface abundances of carbon isotopic ratio and lithium with stellar evolution predictions. These chemicals are sensitive to extra-mixing on the red-giant branch. Results. We estimate mass, radius, and distance for each star using the seismic constraints. We note that the Hipparcos and seismic distances are different. However, the uncertainties are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
