Purity, formality, and arrangement complements
Cl\'ement Dupont

TL;DR
This paper proves that the rational homotopy type of complements of certain algebraic varieties, like toric arrangements, is determined by their cohomology, extending classical results for hyperplane arrangements.
Contribution
It establishes a 'purity implies formality' result in rational homotopy theory and applies it to show that complements of toric arrangements are formal.
Findings
Complement of a toric arrangement is formal
Generalizes classical hyperplane arrangement results
Connects purity with formality in algebraic topology
Abstract
We prove a "purity implies formality" statement in the context of the rational homotopy theory of smooth complex algebraic varieties, and apply it to complements of hypersurface arrangements. In particular, we prove that the complement of a toric arrangement is formal. This is analogous to the classical formality theorem for complements of hyperplane arrangements, due to Brieskorn, and generalizes a theorem of De Concini and Procesi.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
