Expansions of pseudofinite structures and circuit and proof complexity
Jan Krajicek

TL;DR
This paper explores how expanding pseudofinite structures can impact computational complexity, particularly suggesting that certain expansions could imply NP is not closed under complement if one-way permutations exist.
Contribution
It introduces a model-theoretic approach to constructing expansions of pseudofinite structures and connects these to major open problems in computational complexity.
Findings
A specific expansion could imply NP is not closed under complement
Framework links model theory with circuit and proof complexity
Provides examples relevant to computational complexity
Abstract
I shall describe a general model-theoretic task to construct expansions of pseudofinite structures and discuss several examples of particular relevance to computational complexity. Then I will present one specific situation where finding a suitable expansion would imply that, assuming a one-way permutation exists, the computational class NP is not closed under complementation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory
