Criteria for Sample Selection to Maximize Planet Sensitivity and Yield from Space-Based Microlens Parallax Surveys
Jennifer C. Yee, Andrew Gould, Charles Beichman, Sebastiano Calchi, Novati, Sean Carey, B. Scott Gaudi, Calen Henderson, David Nataf, Matthew, Penny, Yossi Shvartzvald, Wei Zhu

TL;DR
This paper establishes objective criteria and procedures for selecting microlensing events in space-based surveys to maximize planet detection sensitivity while minimizing biases, ensuring a controlled and unbiased sample for studying exoplanet populations.
Contribution
It introduces specific objective and subjective selection procedures and conflict resolution methods to optimize planet sensitivity in space-based microlensing surveys.
Findings
Defined objective criteria for event selection and cadence
Established procedures to separate subjective and objective decisions
Maximized planet sensitivity through optimized selection protocols
Abstract
Space-based microlens parallax measurements are a powerful tool for understanding planet populations, especially their distribution throughout the Galaxy. However, if space-based observations of the microlensing events must be specifically targeted, it is crucial that microlensing events enter the parallax sample without reference to the known presence or absence of planets. Hence, it is vital to define objective criteria for selecting events where possible and to carefully consider and minimize the selection biases where not possible so that the final sample represents a controlled experiment. We present objective criteria for initiating observations and determining their cadence for a subset of events, and we define procedures for isolating subjective decision making from information about detected planets for the remainder of events. We also define procedures to resolve conflicts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
