Rational Proofs with Multiple Provers
Jing Chen, Samuel McCauley, Shikha Singh

TL;DR
This paper introduces multi-prover rational interactive proofs (MRIP), demonstrating they are more powerful than single-prover systems and characterizing their capabilities under various utility gap conditions.
Contribution
The paper defines MRIP protocols, analyzes their power relative to existing proof systems, and establishes tight characterizations for different utility gap classes.
Findings
MRIP is more powerful than RIP and MIP under standard assumptions.
Two provers and three rounds suffice to achieve full MRIP power.
Constant, noticeable, and negligible utility gaps are all effectively characterized.
Abstract
Interactive proofs (IP) model a world where a verifier delegates computation to an untrustworthy prover, verifying the prover's claims before accepting them. IP protocols have applications in areas such as verifiable computation outsourcing, computation delegation, cloud computing. In these applications, the verifier may pay the prover based on the quality of his work. Rational interactive proofs (RIP), introduced by Azar and Micali (2012), are an interactive-proof system with payments, in which the prover is rational rather than untrustworthy---he may lie, but only to increase his payment. Rational proofs leverage the provers' rationality to obtain simple and efficient protocols. Azar and Micali show that RIP=IP(=PSAPCE). They leave the question of whether multiple provers are more powerful than a single prover for rational and classical proofs as an open problem. In this paper, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
