Chemical reactions induced by oscillating external fields in weak thermal environments
Galen T. Craven, Thomas Bartsch, Rigoberto Hernandez

TL;DR
This paper develops a method to determine reaction rates in chemical systems driven by oscillating external fields, extending previous work to multi-mode forcing and showing that deterministic transition state geometry can predict rates under weak thermal noise.
Contribution
The paper introduces a recrossing-free dividing surface for multi-mode periodic forcing and demonstrates that deterministic transition state geometry accurately predicts reaction rates under weak thermal noise.
Findings
Agreement between stability analysis and numerical reactive flux calculations.
Transition state geometry of deterministic system approximates reaction rates under weak thermal noise.
Method simplifies rate calculations without extensive brute-force simulations.
Abstract
Chemical reaction rates must increasingly be determined in systems that evolve under the control of external stimuli. In these systems, when a reactant population is induced to cross an energy barrier through forcing from a temporally varying external field, the transition state that the reaction must pass through during the transformation from reactant to product is no longer a fixed geometric structure, but is instead time-dependent. For a periodically forced model reaction, we develop a recrossing-free dividing surface that is attached to a transition state trajectory [T. Bartsch, R. Hernandez, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 058301 (2005)]. We have previously shown that for single-mode sinusoidal driving, the stability of the time-varying transition state directly determines the reaction rate [G. T. Craven, T. Bartsch, and R. Hernandez, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 041106 (2014)]. Here, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
