Frugal Bribery in Voting
Palash Dey, Neeldhara Misra, and Y. Narahari

TL;DR
This paper introduces and analyzes the computational complexity of frugal bribery problems in elections, focusing on bribery without money and its variants, across different voting rules and election weights.
Contribution
It formulates new frugal bribery problems that model illegal bribery without money and studies their complexity for various voting rules and election types.
Findings
Frugal-bribery is tractable for unweighted plurality, veto, k-approval, k-veto, and runoff rules.
Most problems are intractable for weighted elections, even with few candidates.
Frugal-{dollar}bribery is hard for most rules except plurality and veto in unweighted elections.
Abstract
Bribery in elections is an important problem in computational social choice theory. However, bribery with money is often illegal in elections. Motivated by this, we introduce the notion of frugal bribery and formulate two new pertinent computational problems which we call Frugal-bribery and Frugal- $bribery to capture bribery without money in elections. In the proposed model, the briber is frugal in nature and this is captured by her inability to bribe votes of a certain kind, namely, non-vulnerable votes. In the Frugal-bribery problem, the goal is to make a certain candidate win the election by changing only vulnerable votes. In the Frugal-{dollar}bribery problem, the vulnerable votes have prices and the goal is to make a certain candidate win the election by changing only vulnerable votes, subject to a budget constraint of the briber. We further formulate two natural variants of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
