
TL;DR
This paper explores whether machines can genuinely think by examining the fundamental assumptions about the nature of thought and its potential emulation through algorithms, highlighting philosophical and technical considerations.
Contribution
It critically analyzes the assumptions behind machine thought and discusses the implications of achieving or emulating thought algorithmically.
Findings
Thought may be fundamentally different from algorithmic processes
Emulating thought requires redefining what 'thinking' entails
The question challenges the limits of artificial intelligence
Abstract
Can machines truly think? This question and its answer have many implications that depend, in large part, on any number of assumptions underlying how the issue has been addressed or considered previously. A crucial question, and one that is almost taken for granted, is the starting point for this discussion: Can "thought" be achieved or emulated by algorithmic procedures?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
