Is there contextuality in behavioral and social systems?
Ehtibar Dzhafarov, Ru Zhang, and Janne Kujala

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether behavioral and social systems exhibit contextuality similar to quantum systems, finding no evidence of contextuality in various data sets and suggesting such systems are generally noncontextual.
Contribution
It applies the Contextuality-by-Default theory to behavioral and social data, demonstrating the absence of contextuality across diverse experiments and proposing a broad noncontextuality hypothesis.
Findings
No evidence of contextuality in surveyed data sets
Behavioral and social systems are likely noncontextual
Contextual effects are due to response dependencies
Abstract
Most behavioral and social experiments aimed at revealing contextuality are confined to cyclic systems with binary outcomes. In quantum physics, this broad class of systems includes as special cases Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky-type, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell-type, and Suppes-Zanotti-Leggett-Garg-type systems. The theory of contextuality known as Contextuality-by-Default allows one to define and measure contextuality in all such system, even if there are context-dependent errors in measurements, or if something in the contexts directly interacts with the measurements. This makes the theory especially suitable for behavioral and social systems, where direct interactions of "everything with everything" are ubiquitous. For cyclic systems with binary outcomes the theory provides necessary and sufficient conditions for noncontextuality, and these conditions are known to be breached…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
